Faus v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faus v. Lavine

44 A.D.2d 582, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5456

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 582 (Faus v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faus v. Lavine, 44 A.D.2d 582, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, dated April 23, 1973, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Westchester County Department of Social Services, dated November 30, 1972, denying petitioner’s application for medical assistance on the ground that a valid contractual agreement covering “all necessary medical services” for petitioner was in existence. Petition dismissed on the merits,-without costs. We find .that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and determination under review. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, dated April 23, 1973, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Westchester County Department of Social Services, dated November 30, 1972, denying petitioner’s application for medical assistance on the ground that a valid contractual agreement covering “all necessary medical services” for petitioner was in existence. Petition dismissed on the merits,-without costs. We find .that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and determination under review. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 582, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faus-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack