Faurot v. Park National Bank

37 Ill. App. 322, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 187
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 11, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Waterman, J.

In this case it appears that attachment proceedings were begun by the Park National Bank against Benjamin C. Faurot, on the 12th day of April, 1889. Faurot appeared by attorney May 21, 1889, and on the 15th day of June, 1889, filed his plea of the general issue.

On the 18th of June the default of Faurot “ for want of a plea ” was taken, and judgment was entered against him for §3,829.74.

It is doubtless the case that neither the court nor the plaintiff below were aware that a plea had been filed when the default was entered. However this may be, with a plea on file, it was error, without some disposition of the plea, to enter the default of Faurot. Parrot v. Goss, 17 Ill. App. 110; Mason v. Abbott, 83 Ill. 445; Sammis v. Clark. 17 Ill. 398; Steelman v. Watson, 5 Gilm. 249; McKenney v. May, 1 Scam. 334.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faurot v. Park National Bank, 37 Ill. App. 322, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 187 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

37 Ill. App. 322 (Faurot v. Park National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorn v. Briggs
106 Ill. App. 79 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Dorn v. Bradner Smith & Co.
106 Ill. App. 91 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
Wells v. Mathews
70 Ill. App. 504 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Race v. Irving Park Hall Ass'n
50 Ill. App. 131 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)