Fauntleroy v. Hannibal

8 F. Cas. 1092, 1 Dill. 118
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
DocketCase No. 4,691
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 F. Cas. 1092 (Fauntleroy v. Hannibal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fauntleroy v. Hannibal, 8 F. Cas. 1092, 1 Dill. 118 (circtedmo 1870).

Opinion

DILLON, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on certain coupons attached to bonds issued by the city of Hannibal to the Pike County Railroad Company of Illinois, in 1858, to aid in the construction of that railroad. The defendant demurred to the declaration on the ground that the act amending the charter of the city of Hannibal and authorizing it to subscribe to the capital stock of the-company, was not set forth in the declaration; also that as neither that act nor the charter of the city were declared to be public acts, the courts could not take judicial notice of them.

The court, upon consideration, is of opinion that the act is in its nature public, though relating only to the powers of a single municipal or public corporation; and consequently, that it can judicially notice it, without a declaration therein that it is a public act Charters for the government of cities and towns are, in this country, public in their nature, and not special or private acts. Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Fire-Engine Company
12 R.I. 202 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1878)
Township Committee of Union v. Rader
39 N.J.L. 509 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 1092, 1 Dill. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fauntleroy-v-hannibal-circtedmo-1870.