Faulstich v. Ladd

D.C. Circuit

Faulstich v. Ladd

338 F.2d 265, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 156

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1964

DocketNos. 18153, 18154

StatusPublished

Cited by28 cases

This text of 338 F.2d 265 (Faulstich v. Ladd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faulstich v. Ladd, 338 F.2d 265, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 156 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These cases came on to be heard on the record on appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 218 F.Supp. 830, and were argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court on appeal in these cases is hereby affirmed without prejudice to the reopening of the proceedings before the Patent Office, through any means available, for the purpose of allowing appellant the opportunity to amplify her applications for patents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These cases came on to be heard on the record on appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 218 F.Supp. 830, and were argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court on appeal in these cases is hereby affirmed without prejudice to the reopening of the proceedings before the Patent Office, through any means available, for the purpose of allowing appellant the opportunity to amplify her applications for patents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 F.2d 265, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulstich-v-ladd-cadc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack