Faulkner v. Suydam

The Superior Court of New York City

Faulkner v. Suydam

7 Rob. 614

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Rob. 614 (Faulkner v. Suydam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faulkner v. Suydam, 7 Rob. 614 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Jones, J.

There is no reason why the court should be called on to make orders of this description.' The course of the parties is to present to the clerk the memorandum mentioned in chapter 348 of the laws'of 1845, with such proof of the assignment as can be obtained, and to request him to satisfy the judgment as to the compromising debtor. If the clerk refuse so to satisfy the judgment, application may be made to the court for an order directing him so to do; on which application the court will direct to whom, and in what manner, notice of the application shall be given.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones, J.

There is no reason why the court should be called on to make orders of this description.' The course of the parties is to present to the clerk the memorandum mentioned in chapter 348 of the laws'of 1845, with such proof of the assignment as can be obtained, and to request him to satisfy the judgment as to the compromising debtor. If the clerk refuse so to satisfy the judgment, application may be made to the court for an order directing him so to do; on which application the court will direct to whom, and in what manner, notice of the application shall be given.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Rob. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulkner-v-suydam-nysuperctnyc-1867.