Faulkner v. State
366 S.W.3d 85, 2012 WL 1623578, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 633
Opinion
ORDER
Jamie Faulkner appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorándum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of *86 law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (6).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faulkner v. State, 366 S.W.3d 85, 2012 WL 1623578, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 633 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
366 S.W.3d 85 (Faulkner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. BEVINEAU-DICKSON
366 S.W.3d 85 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)