Faulkner v. Schriro
256 F. App'x 68
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief, and the response to this court’s August 23, 2007 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summaiily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faulkner v. Schriro, 256 F. App'x 68 (9th Cir. 2007).
256 F. App'x 68 (Faulkner v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)