Faulkner v. Rasnic

Missouri Court of Appeals

Faulkner v. Rasnic

448 S.W.3d 873, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 2014 WL 6682513

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2014·No. No. ED 101188·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff/Appellant Todd Faulkner sought damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of Defendant Matthew Roddy (“Roddy”) and Defendant/Respondent Craig Rasnic (“Rasnic”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff/Appellant Todd Faulkner sought damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of Defendant Matthew Roddy (“Roddy”) and Defendant/Respondent Craig Rasnic (“Rasnic”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Faulkner v. Rasnic, 448 S.W.3d 873, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318, 2014 WL 6682513 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 873 (Faulkner v. Rasnic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.