Faulkner v. Hutchins

Eighth Circuit

Faulkner v. Hutchins

126 F. 362, 61 C.C.A. 425, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 3, 1903

DocketNo. 1,849

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 F. 362 (Faulkner v. Hutchins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faulkner v. Hutchins, 126 F. 362, 61 C.C.A. 425, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328 (8th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree in this case was against R. B. Faulkner, Fayette Owens, Jim Bends, Minnie Owens, and John Crisp for possession of real estate, and against R. B. Faulkner, George W. Holder, M. W. Riley, M. L. Powers, J. T. Jack, and John Draughon for $560. The appeal was taken by R. B. Faulkner alone from this joint decree, and there is no evidence in the record of any summons and severance or of any notice to the other defendants to participate in the appeal. A separate appeal by a single party from a joint decree against him and others cannot be maintained without notice to the other defendants. For this reason the decree of the Court of Appeals of the Indian Territory, which dismissed the appeal, was right, and it is affirmed. Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416, 19 L. Ed. 953; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179, 181, 13 Sup. Ct. 39, 36 L. Ed. 933; Davis v. Trust Co., 152 U. S. 590, 14 Sup. Ct. 693, 38 L. Ed. 563; Gray v. Havemeyer, 3 C. C. A. 497, 505, 53 Fed. 174, 178; Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. McClure, 78 Fed. 211, 212, 24 C. C. A. 66, 67; Dodson v. Fletcher, 78 Fed. 214, 215, 24 C. C. A. 69, 70.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decree in this case was against R. B. Faulkner, Fayette Owens, Jim Bends, Minnie Owens, and John Crisp for possession of real estate, and against R. B. Faulkner, George W. Holder, M. W. Riley, M. L. Powers, J. T. Jack, and John Draughon for $560. The appeal was taken by R. B. Faulkner alone from this joint decree, and there is no evidence in the record of any summons and severance or of any notice to the other defendants to participate in the appeal. A separate appeal by a single party from a joint decree against him and others cannot be maintained without notice to the other defendants. For this reason the decree of the Court of Appeals of the Indian Territory, which dismissed the appeal, was right, and it is affirmed. Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wall. 416, 19 L. Ed. 953; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U. S. 179, 181, 13 Sup. Ct. 39, 36 L. Ed. 933; Davis v. Trust Co., 152 U. S. 590, 14 Sup. Ct. 693, 38 L. Ed. 563; Gray v. Havemeyer, 3 C. C. A. 497, 505, 53 Fed. 174, 178; Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. McClure, 78 Fed. 211, 212, 24 C. C. A. 66, 67; Dodson v. Fletcher, 78 Fed. 214, 215, 24 C. C. A. 69, 70.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 F. 362, 61 C.C.A. 425, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulkner-v-hutchins-ca8-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack