Faulkner v. Goord

245 A.D.2d 935, 666 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13593
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 935 (Faulkner v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faulkner v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 935, 666 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Ser[936]*936vices which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits organizing or encouraging others to participate in work stoppages or other disruptive activities. Presented in evidence at petitioner’s disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report charging that petitioner had distributed a memorandum to the leaders of various inmate factions encouraging them to participate in a facility-wide strike. Also in evidence was the testimony of a correction officer who corroborated the information in the misbehavior report and stated that petitioner had admitted to him that he had distributed the memorandum around the prison yard. This was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). Petitioner’s testimony to the contrary presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, id.). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his allegations of procedural errors, have been examined and are either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gainey v. Goord
278 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 935, 666 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulkner-v-goord-nyappdiv-1997.