Faulkner v. Carpenter

186 N.C. 780
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 5, 1923·Published

Opinion

Pee Cuexam:.

We are constrained to believe and to conclude, from a careful perusal of tbe entire record, tbat tbis case has been tried substantially in accordance with tbe law bearing on tbe subject. No ruling or action on tbe part of tbe trial court bas been discovered by us wbicb we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Tbe verdict and judgment, therefore, will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faulkner v. Carpenter, 186 N.C. 780 (N.C. 1923).

186 N.C. 780 (Faulkner v. Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.