Faulkner v. 609-611-615 Owner's Corp.

49 A.D.3d 596, 852 N.Y.2d 790
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[597] The defendant 609-611-615 Owner’s Corp. (hereinafter the defendant), a cooperative corporation, established its entitlement to summary judgment by showing that it did not reject the plaintiffs application to purchase an apartment in a cooperative development in violation of Executive Law § 296, based on the plaintiffs sex, race, or marital status. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see McCarthy v St. Francis Hosp., 41 AD3d 794 [2007]; Cesar v Highland Care Ctr., Inc., 37 AD3d 393, 394 [2007]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faulkner v. 609-611-615 Owner's Corp., 49 A.D.3d 596, 852 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 596 (Faulkner v. 609-611-615 Owner's Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maun v. Edgemont at Tarrytown Condominium
2017 NY Slip Op 9120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)