Faulkner Advertising Associates, Incorporated v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.
This text of 917 F.2d 790 (Faulkner Advertising Associates, Incorporated v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
The appellee’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to the Court. A majority of judges having voted in a requested poll of the Court to grant rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the rehearing in banc is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be calendared for argument at the February, 1991 session of Court. Within ten days of the date of this order four additional copies of appellant’s briefs, five additional copies of appellees briefs, four additional copies of appellant’s reply brief shall be filed and appellee will file ten additional copies of the joint appendix.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 F.2d 790, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18500, 1990 WL 158487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulkner-advertising-associates-incorporated-v-nissan-motor-corporation-ca4-1990.