Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Faulk v. State

Faulk v. State

626 So. 2d 1063, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 1993 WL 461949
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 1993
DocketNo. 92-02060
StatusPublished

This text of 626 So. 2d 1063 (Faulk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faulk v. State, 626 So. 2d 1063, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 1993 WL 461949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinions

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

We remand this case for resentencing within the guidelines because the trial court in imposing a sentence that departed from the permitted guidelines range failed to provide contemporaneous reasons in support of the departure. See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

PARKER, J., concurs. ALTENBERND, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lyles
576 So. 2d 706 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hall v. State
598 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 So. 2d 1063, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 1993 WL 461949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulk-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.