Faulk v. State
626 So. 2d 1063, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 1993 WL 461949
Opinions
We remand this case for resentencing within the guidelines because the trial court in imposing a sentence that departed from the permitted guidelines range failed to provide contemporaneous reasons in support of the departure. See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified by State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); see also Hall v. State, 598 So.2d 230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Faulk v. State, 626 So. 2d 1063, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11435, 1993 WL 461949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
626 So. 2d 1063 (Faulk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lyles
576 So. 2d 706 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hall v. State
598 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)