Faulk v. Hearn
This text of 174 S.E. 176 (Faulk v. Hearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “The surety on a bond given by the defendant in an action of trover for the eventual condemnation-money is bound by the judgment against the defendant, and can not after judgment raise any question which could have been raised by the principal before judgment.” Waldrop v. Wolff, 114 Ga. 610 (7), 620 (40 S. E. 830), and cit.
2. Under the foregoing ruling, grounds 1 and 6 of the affidavit of illegality in the instant case were properly overruled.
3. The remaining grounds of the affidavit of illegality are without substantial merit.
4. The court did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 176, 49 Ga. App. 76, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faulk-v-hearn-gactapp-1934.