Fauconier v. Waters
146 F. App'x 644
Opinion
Douglas Fauconier appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fauconier v. Waters, No. RDB-05-39, 2005 WL 1076532 (D.Md. May 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fauconier v. Waters, 146 F. App'x 644 (4th Cir. 2005).
146 F. App'x 644 (Fauconier v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983