Fauconier v. Waters
This text of Fauconier v. Waters (Fauconier v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6807
DOUGLAS FAUCONIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LLOYD WATERS; JOSEPH P. SACCHET,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 05-39-RDB)
Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Fauconier, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Douglas Fauconier appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint filed
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Fauconier v. Waters, No. CA-05-39-RDB
(D. Md. filed May 4, 2005; entered May 5, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fauconier v. Waters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fauconier-v-waters-ca4-2005.