Faucett v. State
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully transporting whisky in quantities in excess of five gallons.
This record presents a plain, simple question of fact. The deputy sheriff, testifying as a witness for the state, says he did; the defendant, testifying as a witness, says he did not. The jury, weighing all the facts, found the defendant guilty.
Under the plainest rules governing such cases the appellate court would not be justi-
fied in disturbing the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
124 So. 921 (Faucett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.