Faucett v. State

124 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 626
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1929·No. 7 Div. 545.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully transporting whisky in quantities in excess of five gallons.

This record presents a plain, simple question of fact. The deputy sheriff, testifying as a witness for the state, says he did; the defendant, testifying as a witness, says he did not. The jury, weighing all the facts, found the defendant guilty.

Under the plainest rules governing such cases the appellate court would not be justi-

fied in disturbing the verdict. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faucett v. State, 124 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 626 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

124 So. 921 (Faucett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.