Fauber v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2010·No. 09-2413·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2413

NATHANIEL J. FAUBER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH: CHRISTY MONOLO; ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE/Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00072-jct)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel J. Fauber, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Nicole Gilliam, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Fauber appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Fauber’s motion

for default judgment, deny his amended motion for default

judgment, deny his second amended motion for default judgment,

deny his motion to remove attorney, and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Fauber v. Commonwealth: Christy

Monolo, No. 5:09-cv-00072-jct (W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fauber v. Commonwealth, (4th Cir. 2010).

Fauber v. Commonwealth (Fauber v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.