Fattah v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fattah v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

211 A.D.2d 662, 622 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 A.D.2d 662 (Fattah v. Getty Petroleum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fattah v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 211 A.D.2d 662, 622 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated June 9, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

All of the causes of action raised by the plaintiff in this action were either raised and determined in the prior Civil Court proceeding, or could have been raised therein. Thus, the court properly dismissed the action on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds (see, D’Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659; O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353; Murphy v Town of Southampton, 168 AD2d 545). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated June 9, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

All of the causes of action raised by the plaintiff in this action were either raised and determined in the prior Civil Court proceeding, or could have been raised therein. Thus, the court properly dismissed the action on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds (see, D’Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659; O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353; Murphy v Town of Southampton, 168 AD2d 545). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 662, 622 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fattah-v-getty-petroleum-corp-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack