Fatir v. Dematteis
This text of Fatir v. Dematteis (Fatir v. Dematteis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
AMIR FATIR, § § No. 238, 2021 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware CLAIRE DEMATTEIS, § COMMISSIONER, D.O.C., § C.A. No. N21M-03-098 § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: August 13, 2021 Decided: September 8, 2021
ORDER
On July 28, 2021, the appellant, Amir Fatir, filed a notice of appeal from the
Superior Court’s March 22, 2021 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas
corpus. Under Supreme Court Rule 6, a timely notice of appeal should have been
filed on or before April 21, 2021. On July 28, 2021, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued,
by certified mail, a notice directing Fatir to show cause why his appeal should not
be dismissed as untimely filed. Fatir received the notice to show cause as evidenced
by the undated return receipt that was filed with the Court on August 2, 2021. A
timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or before August 12, 2021.
To date, Fatir has not responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of the appeal
is therefore deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court
Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fatir v. Dematteis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fatir-v-dematteis-del-2021.