Fatir a/k/a Hobbs v. State
This text of Fatir a/k/a Hobbs v. State (Fatir a/k/a Hobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
AMIR FATIR, A/K/A § STERLING HOBBS, § No. 132, 2018 § Defendant Below, § Court Below: Superior Court Appellant, § of the State of Delaware § v. § ID. No. 75060892DI (N) § STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: April 27, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to
affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the Superior Court’s order of
February 23, 2018, denying the appellant’s most recent motion for correction of
sentence, should be affirmed. The Superior Court’s application of current Criminal
Rule 35 to the appellant’s February 2018 motion, rather than the version of the rule
in effect when the appellant was sentenced in 1976, was entirely correct.*
* See 11 Del. C. § 5121(c) (providing that amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure “shall take effect upon such date as the Superior Court shall fix”). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fatir a/k/a Hobbs v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fatir-aka-hobbs-v-state-del-2018.