Fatig v. DeRosa

261 A.D.2d 954, 690 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 7, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 954 (Fatig v. DeRosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fatig v. DeRosa, 261 A.D.2d 954, 690 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[955]*955ment of divorce, she suffered an unanticipated disabling injury that prevented her from pursuing a nursing career. She is working only part time and her income is minimal, whereas respondent’s income has increased. Thus, petitioner met her burden (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, supra, at 213). The court properly applied the Child Support Standards Act guidelines in determining respondent’s child support obligations (see, Matter of Chappell v Chappell, 229 AD2d 952). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Szczur, J. — Support.) Present— Lawton, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terrell v. Terrell
299 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 954, 690 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fatig-v-derosa-nyappdiv-1999.