Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & Associates

969 A.2d 1181, 600 Pa. 636, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 614

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 2009·No. 410 WAL 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*637 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following two issues, as restated for clarity:

1. ) Whether the arbitrator’s findings of September 17, 2004 constituted a final award within the meaning of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7341?

2. ) Whether a trial court has equitable powers to terminate a common law arbitration prior to the entry of a final award by the arbitrator?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*637 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following two issues, as restated for clarity:

1. ) Whether the arbitrator’s findings of September 17, 2004 constituted a final award within the meaning of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7341?

2. ) Whether a trial court has equitable powers to terminate a common law arbitration prior to the entry of a final award by the arbitrator?

Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & Associates, 969 A.2d 1181, 600 Pa. 636, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 614 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

969 A.2d 1181 (Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.