Fastness Trade, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fastness Trade, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank

559 So. 2d 1297, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2817, 1990 WL 49835

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 1990

DocketNo. 88-2772

StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 1297 (Fastness Trade, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fastness Trade, Inc. v. NCNB National Bank, 559 So. 2d 1297, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2817, 1990 WL 49835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly concluded that on this record section 673.418, Florida Statutes (1989), did not afford Fastness Trade, Inc. a defense to NCNB National Bank’s claim. See National Sav. & Trust Co. v. Park Corp., 722 F.2d 1303, 37 U.C.C. Rep. 817 (6th Cir.1983); cf. Riggs Nat’l Bank v. [1298]*1298Dade Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 268 F.2d 951, 955 (5th Cir.1959) (recognizing availability of claim for unjust enrichment).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly concluded that on this record section 673.418, Florida Statutes (1989), did not afford Fastness Trade, Inc. a defense to NCNB National Bank’s claim. See National Sav. & Trust Co. v. Park Corp., 722 F.2d 1303, 37 U.C.C. Rep. 817 (6th Cir.1983); cf. Riggs Nat’l Bank v. [1298]*1298Dade Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 268 F.2d 951, 955 (5th Cir.1959) (recognizing availability of claim for unjust enrichment).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 1297, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2817, 1990 WL 49835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fastness-trade-inc-v-ncnb-national-bank-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack