Fastag v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fastag v. Kelly

5 A.D.3d 181, 772 N.Y.S.2d 516, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.3d 181 (Fastag v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fastag v. Kelly, 5 A.D.3d 181, 772 N.Y.S.2d 516, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered February 6, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Department’s revocation of petitioner’s premises pistol license, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The application was properly denied upon petitioner’s admission that he removed the pistol from the address listed on the subject license without the express written permission of the commanding officer of the License Division, in violation of the geographical and use restrictions of the license (38 RCNY 5-23 [a] [1]; see Matter of Perrone v Bratton, 226 AD2d 150 [1996]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered February 6, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Police Department’s revocation of petitioner’s premises pistol license, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The application was properly denied upon petitioner’s admission that he removed the pistol from the address listed on the subject license without the express written permission of the commanding officer of the License Division, in violation of the geographical and use restrictions of the license (38 RCNY 5-23 [a] [1]; see Matter of Perrone v Bratton, 226 AD2d 150 [1996]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.3d 181, 772 N.Y.S.2d 516, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fastag-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack