Fast v. Canton, Aberdeen & Nashville Railroad

77 Miss. 498
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 77 Miss. 498 (Fast v. Canton, Aberdeen & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fast v. Canton, Aberdeen & Nashville Railroad, 77 Miss. 498 (Mich. 1899).

Opinion

'Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It was error to grant tire peremptory instruction. The fact that the consignor and consignee named in the bill of lading was the Western Sale & Feed Stable Co. was not conclusive as to ownership; that is explained by the testimony of appellant, lie testifies positively that the live stock belonged to him, and the bill of lading ivas written up as it was to secure the Western Sale &• Feed Stable Go. for a small balance on some of the stock bought from them, but that he had full authority to sell the live stock. This is not an action on the contract, but an action of .tort, for damages, in which the real owner must sue. Waters v. Mobile, etc., R. R. Co., 14 Miss., 534; Kansas City, etc., R. R. Co. v. Cantrell, 70 Miss., 329. The case of Teams v. Illinois, etc., R. R. Co. is wholly unlike this on the testimony as to injury.

Reversed ancl remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Cantrell
70 Miss. 329 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1892)
Nevitt v. Bank of Port Gibson
14 Miss. 513 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Miss. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fast-v-canton-aberdeen-nashville-railroad-miss-1899.