Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin·Decided December 15, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00486·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

EVAN R. FASSBENDER,

Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-486-JPS v.

STATE OF WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS, KIRSTEN JOHNSON, EMILIE ORDER AMUNDSON, PAUL BUGENHAGEN, JR., ZACHARY M. BOSCH, LINDA SAAFIR, MICHAEL P. MAXWELL, DANIEL JAMES SIELAFF, ANDREA E. LAU, MARTIN BINN, DAVID HERRING, KIMBERLY HAINES, LISA A. KWASIGROCH, DEANNA STEVLINGSON, THOMAS J. PIEPER, MONICA WALRATH, RALPH M. RAMIREZ, ERIN FURGASON, MARYLEE RICHMOND, GRACE ISON, ERIC J. SEVERSON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, COURT, WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COMMISSION, CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY, CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, WAUKESHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and WAUKESHA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

Defendants. On April 19, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff Evan R. Fassbender’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff appealed that order. ECF No. 13. The Seventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, noting that Plaintiff filed his notice of appeal late and that this Court had not granted him additional time in which to do so. ECF No. 18; see also ECF No. 11 (order clarifying for Plaintiff the process for filing an appeal, moving for an extension of time in which to do so, and moving to do so without prepayment of the separate appellate filing fee). Plaintiff has not been permitted to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (and the Seventh Circuit has not displaced the Court’s finding that Plaintiff is not entitled to do so), and he has not yet paid the applicable filing fee in this case. Accordingly, the Court will order that Plaintiff pay the applicable district court filing fee of $405.00 on or before December 29, 2023. If Plaintiff pays the filing fee, the Court may still screen his complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Rowe v. Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999) (“[D]istrict courts have the power to screen complaints filed by all litigants . . . regardless of fee status.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 608 (6th Cir. 1997))). If he fails to do so, this case will be dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s outstanding motions, ECF Nos. 6 and 8, will be denied as moot. Civ. L.R. 41(c) (permitting dismissal of actions for “lack of diligence”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Evan R. Fassbender must remit the entire $405.00 filing fee for this action on or before December 29, 2023; failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 15th day of December, 2023. BY THE \ PUY Axa Live J.P. stay ueller U.S\ District Judge

Plaintiff will be required to submit all correspondence and legal material to: Office of the Clerk United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin 362 United States Courthouse 517 E. Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 DO NOT MAIL ANYTHING DIRECTLY TO THE COURT’S CHAMBERS. If mail is received directly to the Court’s chambers, IT WILL BE RETURNED TO SENDER AND WILL NOT BE FILED IN THE CASE.

Plaintiff is further advised that failure to timely file any brief, motion, response, or reply may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. In addition, the parties must notify the Clerk of Court of any change of address. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO PROVIDE AN UPDATED ADDRESS TO THE COURT AND MAIL IS RETURNED TO THE COURT AS UNDELIVERABLE, THE COURT WILL DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Page 3 of 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin, (E.D. Wis. 2023).

Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin (Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related