Fassari v. Lo Dolce
This text of 247 A.D. 758 (Fassari v. Lo Dolce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with [759]*759ten dollars costs. There is no showing of merit by the plaintiff or his attorney, and, specifically, no showing that the automobile was being operated at the time of the accident with the express or implied consent of the defendant. The excuse presented for the delay of nearly three years is inadequate, and the plaintiff has not sustained the burden of showing no unreasonable neglect. (McGee v. Levy, 215 App. Div. 720.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fassari-v-lo-dolce-nyappdiv-1936.