FASOLO, MICHAEL v. SCARAFILE, JOSEPH A.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in FASOLO, MICHAEL v. SCARAFILE, JOSEPH A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 929 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 2014·No. CA 13-02057·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

622 CA 13-02057 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MICHAEL FASOLO AND PREMIER BUILDING GROUP, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH A. SCARAFILE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GUSTAVE J. DETRAGLIA, JR., UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ALBANY (DAVID B. CABANISS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered July 11, 2013. The order denied plaintiffs= motion for leave to renew and reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Fasolo v Scarafile ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

622 CA 13-02057 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

MICHAEL FASOLO AND PREMIER BUILDING GROUP, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH A. SCARAFILE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GUSTAVE J. DETRAGLIA, JR., UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ALBANY (DAVID B. CABANISS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered July 11, 2013. The order denied plaintiffs= motion for leave to renew and reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Fasolo v Scarafile ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

FASOLO, MICHAEL v. SCARAFILE, JOSEPH A., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

FASOLO, MICHAEL v. SCARAFILE, JOSEPH A. (FASOLO, MICHAEL v. SCARAFILE, JOSEPH A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.