Fasik Zeleke v. the City of Tucker, Georgia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 25, 2025
DocketA26D0163
StatusPublished

This text of Fasik Zeleke v. the City of Tucker, Georgia (Fasik Zeleke v. the City of Tucker, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fasik Zeleke v. the City of Tucker, Georgia, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 25, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26D0163. FASIK ZELEKE et al. v. THE CITY OF TUCKER, GEORGIA.

After the Community Development Department of the City of Tucker (“City”) denied Fasik Zeleke and his businesses (“Petitioners”) a permit to operate Coin Operated Amusement Machines (COAM), Petitioners filed a petition for review to the superior court. The superior court affirmed the denial of the COAM permit on September 25, 2025, and the Petitioners filed this application on Tuesday, October 28, 2025. The City has filed a motion to dismiss the application. We agree that we lack jurisdiction. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35(d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35(d). Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). The Petitioners have filed their application 33 days after the trial court’s order. Accordingly, this application is untimely. The City’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/25/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Hill v. State
420 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fasik Zeleke v. the City of Tucker, Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fasik-zeleke-v-the-city-of-tucker-georgia-gactapp-2025.