Fashionette Dress Co. v. Mintz
This text of 249 A.D. 646 (Fashionette Dress Co. v. Mintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the proposed defendant Friedman’s motion to vacate an order directing her deposition be taken in order to enable the proposed plaintiff to frame a complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 646, 292 N.Y.S. 936, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fashionette-dress-co-v-mintz-nyappdiv-1936.