Fasenmyer v. State
This text of 413 So. 2d 33 (Fasenmyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon our review of the complete record of appellant’s conviction for breaking and entering, we find insufficient admissible evidence of a breaking and that the highest offense sustained by the record on that charge is that of entering without breaking with intent to commit a felony. No error affects appellant’s other convictions. The breaking and entering judgment is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for entry of an appropriate judgment and for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 So. 2d 33, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fasenmyer-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.