Fasano v. Battista

68 A.D.3d 863, 890 N.Y.2d 618
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 863 (Fasano v. Battista) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fasano v. Battista, 68 A.D.3d 863, 890 N.Y.2d 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

[864]*864Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court properly dismissed, without a hearing, her petition to modify a prior order so as to award her sole custody. Where possible, custody should be established on a long term basis, “at least so long as the custodial parent has not been shown to be unfit, or perhaps less fit, to continue as the proper custodian” (Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768, 770 [1975]; see Matter of Lopez v Infante, 55 AD3d 837 [2008]; DiVittorio v DiVittorio, 36 AD3d 848, 849 [2007]; Jackson v Jackson, 31 AD3d 386 [2006]). A noncustodial parent seeking a change of custody is not entitled to a hearing without making some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see Matter of Lopez v Infante, 55 AD3d at 838; Matter of Bauman v Abbate, 48 AD3d 679, 680 [2008]; DiVittorio v DiVittorio, 36 AD3d at 849). Here, the mother failed to make such a showing.

We decline the father’s request to impose sanctions against the mother. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Li Wong v. Fen Liu
2018 NY Slip Op 1607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 863, 890 N.Y.2d 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fasano-v-battista-nyappdiv-2009.