Farwell v. Sturges

56 F. 782, 6 C.C.A. 118, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2114
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1893
DocketNo. 67
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 F. 782 (Farwell v. Sturges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farwell v. Sturges, 56 F. 782, 6 C.C.A. 118, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2114 (7th Cir. 1893).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived, and the court below made a special finding- of the facts. The finding is in all -respects supported by evidence, though in some particulars the testimony is conflicting. Questions of fact only are urged upon oiir consideration. It is well settled that findings of fact by the court, in cases at law:, like the verdict of a jury, cannot be re[783]*783viewed on. appeal or wilt of error. Reed v. Stapp, 3 C. C. A. 244, 52 Fed. Rep. 641, and cases cited. The judgment below is therefore affirmed, with interest and costs, and with 2 per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardman v. Montana Union Ry. Co.
83 F. 88 (Ninth Circuit, 1897)
Rhodes v. United States Nat. Bank
66 F. 512 (Seventh Circuit, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. 782, 6 C.C.A. 118, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farwell-v-sturges-ca7-1893.