Farwell v. City of Cambridge
This text of 77 Mass. 413 (Farwell v. City of Cambridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The extent to which the benefit to the property of the petitioners, by the laying out of the highway, should be set off against the damage thereby sustained, was stated to the jury conformably to the decisions made in Meacham v. Fitchburg Railroad, 4 Cush. 291, and Upton v. South Reading Branch Railroad, 8 Cush. 600. And we cannot think that the particular words and illustrations afterwards used by the sheriff, which have been criticised in argument, could have misled the jury in their application of the doctrine of those decisions. The order of the court of common pleas rejecting the verdict is therefore reversed, and the Verdict accepted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farwell-v-city-of-cambridge-mass-1858.