Farwell v. Board of Education

Appellate Court of Illinois

Farwell v. Board of Education

166 Ill. App. 298, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 62

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedNovember 28, 1911

DocketGen. No. 17,563

StatusPublished

This text of 166 Ill. App. 298 (Farwell v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farwell v. Board of Education, 166 Ill. App. 298, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 62 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is from a decree entered in the Circuit Court setting aside an appraisal theretofore made upon lots 20 and 21 in block 142 in School Section addition to the city of Chicago. The decree entered is substantially the same as that entered in a suit in which James K. Sebree was complainant, and the Board of Education of the city of Chicago defendant, (that case being the subject of appeal in this court and known as General Number 17562) except as to names of parties and descriptions of property. The two cases were considered together in the court below and also in this court.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in the case above referred to, General Number 17562, we think the decree was erroneous. (See Ante, p. 276.) It will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded with, directions to the Circuit Court to dismiss the hill for want of equity.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is from a decree entered in the Circuit Court setting aside an appraisal theretofore made upon lots 20 and 21 in block 142 in School Section addition to the city of Chicago. The decree entered is substantially the same as that entered in a suit in which James K. Sebree was complainant, and the Board of Education of the city of Chicago defendant, (that case being the subject of appeal in this court and known as General Number 17562) except as to names of parties and descriptions of property. The two cases were considered together in the court below and also in this court.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in the case above referred to, General Number 17562, we think the decree was erroneous. (See Ante, p. 276.) It will therefore be reversed and the cause remanded with, directions to the Circuit Court to dismiss the hill for want of equity.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 Ill. App. 298, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farwell-v-board-of-education-illappct-1911.