Faruolo v. Zahga
This text of 102 N.Y.S. 757 (Faruolo v. Zahga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant herein appeals from a final order in favor of the plaintiff landlord, and presents affidavits showing that no service of the precept was ever made on him. The appeal was taken under the provisions of section 311 of , the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1578, c. 580), and the affidavits were duly served. Austen v. Columbia Lubricants Co. (Sup.) 85 N. Y. Supp. 362. No oppos-, ing affidavits are presented, and those on the part of the defendant show that no jurisdiction was ever acquired by the court to make the final order in question.
Final order reversed, and petition dismissed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.Y.S. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faruolo-v-zahga-nyappterm-1907.