Faruolo v. Zahga

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Faruolo v. Zahga

102 N.Y.S. 757

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 11, 1907·Published

Opinion

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

Defendant herein appeals from a final order in favor of the plaintiff landlord, and presents affidavits showing that no service of the precept was ever made on him. The appeal was taken under the provisions of section 311 of , the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1578, c. 580), and the affidavits were duly served. Austen v. Columbia Lubricants Co. (Sup.) 85 N. Y. Supp. 362. No oppos-, ing affidavits are presented, and those on the part of the defendant show that no jurisdiction was ever acquired by the court to make the final order in question.

Final order reversed, and petition dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

Defendant herein appeals from a final order in favor of the plaintiff landlord, and presents affidavits showing that no service of the precept was ever made on him. The appeal was taken under the provisions of section 311 of , the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1578, c. 580), and the affidavits were duly served. Austen v. Columbia Lubricants Co. (Sup.) 85 N. Y. Supp. 362. No oppos-, ing affidavits are presented, and those on the part of the defendant show that no jurisdiction was ever acquired by the court to make the final order in question.

Final order reversed, and petition dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Faruolo v. Zahga, 102 N.Y.S. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

102 N.Y.S. 757 (Faruolo v. Zahga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related