Farukh Aslam v. Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 6, 2012
Docket02-11-00292-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Farukh Aslam v. Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer (Farukh Aslam v. Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farukh Aslam v. Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

02-11-292-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00292-CV

Farukh Aslam

APPELLANT

V.

Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 96th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant's Notice of Settlement And Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

The motions to dismiss filed by appellees are denied as moot.

          Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MEIER, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  December 6, 2012  




[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Farukh Aslam v. Touchstone Communications - II, LLC, Touchstone Communications (Private) Ltd., Thomas Slone, Michael Meyer, TRS Family, Ltd., MDM RAM, Ltd., Carl Caruso, Newmark Investments Partnership, Ltd., Farrah Karmally, Burgundy Holdings, Ltd., and Joe Seringer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farukh-aslam-v-touchstone-communications-ii-llc-touchstone-texapp-2012.