Farrow v. Attorney Grievance Commission

744 N.W.2d 140, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 396, 2008 WL 434893
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 2008
Docket134907
StatusPublished

This text of 744 N.W.2d 140 (Farrow v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farrow v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 744 N.W.2d 140, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 396, 2008 WL 434893 (Mich. 2008).

Opinion

744 N.W.2d 140 (2008)

Lance FARROW, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Docket No. 134907.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 19, 2008.

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is *141 not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 N.W.2d 140, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 396, 2008 WL 434893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrow-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.