Farrol Waltz v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

Farrol Waltz v. National Labor Relations Board

566 F.2d 1056, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 1977

Docket76-1800

StatusPublished

This text of 566 F.2d 1056 (Farrol Waltz v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrol Waltz v. National Labor Relations Board, 566 F.2d 1056, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781 (6th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the court upon the petition of Farrol Waltz to review and set aside a portion of an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, on April 23,1976. Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board reported at 223 N.L.R.B. 161 for a recitation of pertinent facts. The Board states in its brief that satisfactory compliance with all parts of its order relating to issues other than those involving petitioner Waltz has been obtained.

The Board held that the employer did not violate § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging Waltz for cause. The court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petition for review be and hereby is denied.

Entered by order of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before the court upon the petition of Farrol Waltz to review and set aside a portion of an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, on April 23,1976. Reference is made to the decision and order of the Board reported at 223 N.L.R.B. 161 for a recitation of pertinent facts. The Board states in its brief that satisfactory compliance with all parts of its order relating to issues other than those involving petitioner Waltz has been obtained.

The Board held that the employer did not violate § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging Waltz for cause. The court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petition for review be and hereby is denied.

Entered by order of the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 F.2d 1056, 98 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrol-waltz-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1977.