Farris v. Labette County Medical Center

D. Kansas

Farris v. Labette County Medical Center

DecidedMarch 1, 2021

Docket2:19-cv-02060

StatusUnknown

This text of Farris v. Labette County Medical Center (Farris v. Labette County Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farris v. Labette County Medical Center, (D. Kan. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

MICHAEL FARRIS, M.D., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-2060-HLT-GEB ) LABETTE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Labette County Medical Center d/b/a Labette Health’s motion for leave to amend its Answer (ECF No. 63). As noted in the motion, Plaintiff consents to the motion and under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) it may be granted without further notice. Additionally, in its discretion, the Court finds good cause for the motion made after the scheduling order deadline under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, and finds the balance of factors weigh in favor of amendment as analyzed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), and justice requires amendment.1

1 The court considers a number of factors in deciding whether to allow an amendment, including timeliness, prejudice to the other party, bad faith, and futility of amendment. Minter v. Prime Equip. Co., 451 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)); see also Monge v. St. Francis Health Ctr., Inc., No. 12–2269–EFM-JPO, 2013 WL 328957, at *2 (D. Kan. Jan. 10, 2013), report and recommendation adopted, 2013 WL 328986 (D. Kan. Jan. 29, 2013). Rule 15(a)(2) provides leave “shall be freely given when justice so requires,” and the decision to allow an amendment is within the sound discretion of the court. See J. Vangel Elec., Inc. v. Sugar Creek Packing Co., No. 11–2112–EFM, 2012 WL 5995283, at *2 (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2012) (citing Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, 60 F.3d 1486, 1494 (10th Cir. 1995)). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Labette County Medical Center d/b/a Labette Health’s motion for leave to amend its Answer (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file his First Amended Answer no later than March 15, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated at Wichita, Kansas this 1st day of March, 2021.

s/ Gwynne E. Birzer GWYNNE E. BIRZER United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

MICHAEL FARRIS, M.D., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-2060-HLT-GEB ) LABETTE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Labette County Medical Center d/b/a Labette Health’s motion for leave to amend its Answer (ECF No. 63). As noted in the motion, Plaintiff consents to the motion and under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) it may be granted without further notice. Additionally, in its discretion, the Court finds good cause for the motion made after the scheduling order deadline under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, and finds the balance of factors weigh in favor of amendment as analyzed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), and justice requires amendment.1

1 The court considers a number of factors in deciding whether to allow an amendment, including timeliness, prejudice to the other party, bad faith, and futility of amendment. Minter v. Prime Equip. Co., 451 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)); see also Monge v. St. Francis Health Ctr., Inc., No. 12–2269–EFM-JPO, 2013 WL 328957, at *2 (D. Kan. Jan. 10, 2013), report and recommendation adopted, 2013 WL 328986 (D. Kan. Jan. 29, 2013). Rule 15(a)(2) provides leave “shall be freely given when justice so requires,” and the decision to allow an amendment is within the sound discretion of the court. See J. Vangel Elec., Inc. v. Sugar Creek Packing Co., No. 11–2112–EFM, 2012 WL 5995283, at *2 (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2012) (citing Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, 60 F.3d 1486, 1494 (10th Cir. 1995)). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Labette County Medical Center d/b/a Labette Health’s motion for leave to amend its Answer (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file his First Amended Answer no later than March 15, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated at Wichita, Kansas this 1st day of March, 2021.

s/ Gwynne E. Birzer GWYNNE E. BIRZER United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Farris v. Labette County Medical Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farris-v-labette-county-medical-center-ksd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack