Farrington v. Suydam
9 Wend. 430
Opinion
The plaintiff, after having noticed his cause for trial, was permitted to amend the declaration by changing the venue, on paying the costs of resisting the motion, and of the former plea, if a new defence was interposed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrington v. Suydam, 9 Wend. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
9 Wend. 430 (Farrington v. Suydam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Union Bank v. Mott
11 Abb. Pr. 42 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Barstow v. Randall
5 Hill & Den. 556 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)