Farrington v. State

626 So. 2d 1123, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12004, 1993 WL 495981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farrington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2053
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1993·No. No. 92-3049·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Frederick S. Farrington’s conviction for sexual battery upon a child under the age of sixteen years in violation of section 800.04(3), Florida Statutes (1991); however, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same issue which we certified in Jones v. State, 619 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), rev. granted, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla.1993), namely, whether the constitutional right to privacy renders unconstitutional that portion of section 800.04 which provides that consent is not a defense to a prosecution for sexual activity with a minor under age sixteen.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farrington v. State, 626 So. 2d 1123, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12004, 1993 WL 495981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 1123 (Farrington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
619 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)