Farringer v. State
252 So. 2d 821
Opinion
On the basis of our review of the briefs, the transcript of record and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the circuit court either exceeded its jurisdiction or otherwise departed from essential requirements of law. The petition for cer-tiorari is, therefore, denied. See James v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 52; see also United States v. Robertson, 5 Cir. 1970, 425 F.2d 1386; United States v. Montos, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 215; and United States v. Akin, 5 Cir. 1970, 435 F.2d 1011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farringer v. State, 252 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
252 So. 2d 821 (Farringer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Kenneth George Montos
421 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Earl Miller Robertson
425 F.2d 1386 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Herbert Hoover Akin
435 F.2d 1011 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
James v. State
223 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)