Farringer v. State

252 So. 2d 821
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 23, 1971
DocketNo. 71-224
StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 2d 821 (Farringer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farringer v. State, 252 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the transcript of record and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the circuit court either exceeded its jurisdiction or otherwise departed from essential requirements of law. The petition for cer-tiorari is, therefore, denied. See James v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 52; see also United States v. Robertson, 5 Cir. 1970, 425 F.2d 1386; United States v. Montos, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 215; and United States v. Akin, 5 Cir. 1970, 435 F.2d 1011.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kenneth George Montos
421 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Earl Miller Robertson
425 F.2d 1386 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Herbert Hoover Akin
435 F.2d 1011 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
James v. State
223 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 So. 2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farringer-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.