Farrier v. State ex rel. Dugan
7 A. 881, 48 N.J.L. 613, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 13
Opinion
The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme' Court in its opinion.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Knapp, •Scudder, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 9.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farrier v. State ex rel. Dugan, 7 A. 881, 48 N.J.L. 613, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 13 (N.J. 1886).
7 A. 881 (Farrier v. State ex rel. Dugan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faucette v. Gerlach
200 S.W. 279 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Strange v. Oconto Land Co.
117 N.W. 1023 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Auditor General v. Board of Supervisors
51 N.W. 483 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)