Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons

240 A.D. 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 866 (Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons, 240 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We find no adequate reason in the record for declaring a mistrial. Moreover the court was without power to impose upon the defendants the obligation to pay the sums fixed in the order. The nonsuit granted before the mistrial is a further bar to the order so far as it related to the defendant as to which the nonsuit was granted. All concur; Edgcomb, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We find no adequate reason in the record for declaring a mistrial. Moreover the court was without power to impose upon the defendants the obligation to pay the sums fixed in the order. The nonsuit granted before the mistrial is a further bar to the order so far as it related to the defendant as to which the nonsuit was granted. All concur; Edgcomb, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrelly-v-john-roeblings-sons-nyappdiv-1933.