Farrell v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. White

234 A.D. 904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 904 (Farrell v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. White, 234 A.D. 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in so far as it dismissed upon the merits the plaintiff’s complaint, reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,000, and interest from the 2d day of October, 1930, with costs. The court reverses findings of fact numbered 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 contained in the decision, and makes new findings as follows: That plaintiff executed and discounted a note with the First National Bank of Poultney, Vermont, through her agent and used the proceeds to pay for ten shares of the capital stock of said bank, such transaction taking place on or about August 8, 1929, and that at the time said bank failed defendant was the owner of the ten shares of the capital stock of such bank. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in so far as it dismissed upon the merits the plaintiff’s complaint, reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,000, and interest from the 2d day of October, 1930, with costs. The court reverses findings of fact numbered 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 contained in the decision, and makes new findings as follows: That plaintiff executed and discounted a note with the First National Bank of Poultney, Vermont, through her agent and used the proceeds to pay for ten shares of the capital stock of said bank, such transaction taking place on or about August 8, 1929, and that at the time said bank failed defendant was the owner of the ten shares of the capital stock of such bank. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-white-nyappdiv-1931.