Farrell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

19 A.2d 522, 144 Pa. Super. 365, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 135
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 1941·No. Appeal, 251·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

After full consideration of the briefs and oral arguments we are satisfied that the (Opinion of the Unemployment Compensation Board correctly interprets the provisions of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Acit of December 5,1936, P. L. of 1937, p. 2897) involved in this appeal, with special reference to the employee’s registration for work at a designated employment office, at such times and in such manner as the Department [of Labor and Industry] may prescribe (Sec. 401 (b) ), and the rules and regulations relative to the procedure thereunder prescribed by the department; and on that opinion,

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farrell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 19 A.2d 522, 144 Pa. Super. 365, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 135 (Pa. Ct. App. 1941).

19 A.2d 522 (Farrell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Juster Bros. Inc. v. Christgau
7 N.W.2d 501 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)