Farrell v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. Safir

259 A.D.2d 328, 687 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2768

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 328 (Farrell v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Safir, 259 A.D.2d 328, 687 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), entered May 20, 1997, which denied the petition to annul a determination terminating petitioner’s employment and granted respondents’ cross-motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition granted to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for a hearing.

In light of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Matter of Foley v Bratton (92 NY2d 781, 787), we find that petitioner was entitled to an administrative hearing with regard to her dismissal as a police officer, which was pursuant solely to section 14-115 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, and was based upon her conviction for failure to file Federal income tax returns for two years. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), entered May 20, 1997, which denied the petition to annul a determination terminating petitioner’s employment and granted respondents’ cross-motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition granted to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for a hearing.

In light of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Matter of Foley v Bratton (92 NY2d 781, 787), we find that petitioner was entitled to an administrative hearing with regard to her dismissal as a police officer, which was pursuant solely to section 14-115 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, and was based upon her conviction for failure to file Federal income tax returns for two years. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 328, 687 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-safir-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack