Farrell v. Raycon Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farrell v. Raycon Construction

263 A.D.2d 463, 691 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D.2d 463 (Farrell v. Raycon Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farrell v. Raycon Construction, 263 A.D.2d 463, 691 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Marriott Corporation, d/b/a Marriott Management Services, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered July 31, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent.

[464]*464We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Marriott Corporation, d/b/a Marriott Management Services, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered July 31, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent.

[464]*464We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D.2d 463, 691 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farrell-v-raycon-construction-nyappdiv-1999.